Russia's monetary authority has declared it is claiming compensation valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move is a clear warning from the Kremlin against proposals to use immobilized Russian sovereign funds to support Ukraine.
According to accounts in local state media, the monetary authority filed a claim last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This amount is equivalent to the stated $230 billion claim.
European Union officials will determine later this week on a plan to leverage approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian state funds. The proposal involves providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to finance its defence and financial stability.
Most of these assets, totaling €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear depository in Brussels. Euroclear serves as the main keeper for the Russian frozen sovereign wealth.
EU officials have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. Their position is based on the fact that title of the state assets still belongs to Russia, even though it was frozen in European countries following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Moscow, in contrast, has labeled any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have warned of reciprocal measures, such as seizing EU private investors' holdings within Russia.
The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, a figure who has taken on a prominent position in diplomatic talks, stated on X that Russia "will win in court" and retrieve its assets. He added that the EU, the common currency, and Euroclear "will suffer" from the proposal.
In comments seen as an effort to create division between Europe and the United States, the official characterized the proposal as "a severe assault on the right to ownership and the international reserves system established by the United States."
Euroclear refused to comment on the new lawsuit. The institution has previously stated it is facing more than 100 lawsuits in Russian jurisdictions.
While courts in European nations are not expected to recognize rulings from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue enforcement in countries with stronger ties to the Kremlin.
"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian legal ruling against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, if such assets can be identified," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.
European authorities said they are developing measures to deter other nations from aiding any Russian legal action against European entities. They are also crafting protections to protect EU member states with investments in Russia from what they call "unlawful expropriation."
Under the detailed plan, the EU would issue an initial €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Importantly, Russia's legal claim on the underlying funds would stay untouched.
Ukraine would only be required to return the loan if and when Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage caused during the ongoing conflict.
Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has urged the EU to consider an different method for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU borrowing to secure a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.
Such a proposal, nevertheless, requires unanimity among all 27 member states. The Hungarian government, considered aligned with the Kremlin, has previously expressed its objection.
Commenting on Monday, the EU top diplomat, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "The reparations loan is based on the Russian frozen assets, which means it doesn't come from our taxpayers' money, which is equally significant," she remarked. "Furthermore, it sends a powerful signal that when you cause all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the reparations."